Friends of the Program

Avoiding Shreveport

December 3rd, 2012 by · 2 Comments

Louisiana Tech, gettin’ all frugal, opting for the staycation

To hell with the rankings this week, because Louisiana Tech has now made the entire thing obsolete.  The Bulldogs just went and circumvented the whole wins and losses thing that usually dictates your position in the “Fabulous Holiday Trip to Louisiana’s 3rd Most Glamorous City” pecking order and went straight to the “regrets” phone number at the bottom of the Independence Bowl invitation and made the call.

As the story goes,  Louisiana Tech has made it known for weeks of their desire to play in any bowl not located in the Shreveport-Bossier metro area.  Furthermore, the Bulldogs made it known that should they have to come to said bowl in the Shreveport-Bossier metro area, they would rather not play a team from the Sun Belt Conference, more specifically, the Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks.

As a bit of background, the La Tech/ULM I-20 blood feud has been going on for a while now.  The two teams had been Southland Conference rivals for years (ULM was known as Northeast Louisiana University at the time) but had not met on the football field since 2000.  That next year, ULM joined the Sun Belt and Louisiana Tech joined the WAC.  Those moves alone created a bit more tension, as Louisiana Tech fans and administration felt that a move to the Sun Belt with ULM was a bit below them at the time.  In more recent years, ULM has tried to get Louisiana Tech back on their football schedule, but Tech has continued to refuse the invitation.  That being the case, ULM put all of it sports under the directive to not schedule Louisiana Tech as an opponent for any sport until the Bulldogs acquiesced and agreed to renew the rivalry on the football field with the Warhawks.

As for this year’s Independence Bowl, leading up to this weekend, Louisiana Tech had been working to receive an invite to a bowl with substantially more cache, like say the rich-with-history-and-tradition Heart of Dallas Bowl, or the Memphis fairgrounds-anchored Liberty Bowl.  The plan even looked like it might work once OU beat TCU, Northern Illinois beat Kent State, and Kansas State beat Texas.  All of that would likely mean Oklahoma into the BCS and thus opening a spot in a lower-tier bowl for Louisiana Tech to slide into.  Unfortunately, the voters didn’t cooperate, and put Northern Illinois into the Top 16 in the BCS, thus giving the Huskies a spot in the BCS, knocking OU out, and relegating Louisiana Tech back to the Independence Bowl.

All of this, of course didn’t go down until Sunday.  But on Saturday, the Independence Bowl made a call to Louisiana Tech, inviting them to play in the game against ULM, who they had invited earlier in the week.  Louisiana Tech asked for more time to make a decision, as they were still waiting on the Heart of Dallas or Liberty Bowl to come calling.  The bowl consented to an extension, but told Tech that they needed an answer before Sunday.  As a contingency, the bowl had Ohio as a back-up plan if Tech declined, but of course, a regionally-friendly Tech-ULM match-up would be the more financially desirable option.  The deadline passed with no answer from Tech, and so the bowl moved on, inviting Ohio.

Sunday, Tech, realizing that their options had become limited to Shreveport or bust, called the Independence Bowl back and asked if the offer was still good.  they were informed that it was, in fact, not, thus 9-3 Louisiana Tech would be staying home for bowl season.

This is no one’s fault but Louisiana Tech’s.  I get the desire to “Avoid Shreveport” and all of its crime-infested trappings, but Tech is a 3rd place team in the worst Division I conference in the country.  They went from shaking hands with Orange Bowl officials in early November to losing two straight and having no real leg to stand on.  They should have embraced the bowl in Shreveport with open arms and planted a big wet kiss on her mouth and worried about getting the necessary shots later.  Instead, they jeopardized the long term future with the stadium and the city (Tech plays an almost annual home game in Shreveport against a big opponent for revenue and attendance purposes) for a possible trip to DFW or Memphis in the short term.  For that decision, much like the reason Louisiana Tech lost those two straight late in the season to put them in this position, there is no defense.

All of that now explained, here we stand with your 2012 Avoiding Shreveport winners….everyone but ULM and Ohio…with special recognition to Louisiana Tech, for the most avoidingly avoiding of Shreveport in the history of these rankings.

Categories: College Football
Tags: · · · ·

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 HOT SPROTS TAKES | Throw The Flag Blog // Dec 4, 2012 at 6:50 am

    [...] Avoiding Shreveport got even more aggressive [Friends of The Program] [...]

  • 2 KB // Dec 5, 2012 at 11:38 am

    Reading your article I would have a few things to point out. If you state something you should be able to back it up. Tech is the 3rd place team in the WAC, but the WAC is not the worst conference. That may be your opinion but it is not the opinion of the ESPN ranking which has the WAC at #6.
    http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo

    Tech has played big games in Shreveport over the years and has brought roughly 250K ticket sales to Independence Stadium since 2000. Other than the Indy Bowl games who has brought that kink of revenue to the Stadium or to Shreveport Bossier? If Tech were avoiding Shreveport would we do this? Maybe Tech should consider playing A&M @ Jerryworld and calling it a home game like the ULM home games in Arkansas? Then you could accuse Tech of Avoiding Shreveport.

    Does Tech carry some blame? Sure you can make that case. But considering that Tech has done so much in support of I-Stadium and Shreveport it is sad that they could not wait one more day.

Leave a Comment